Categories
Movie Reviews

Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore

Warner Bros, 2022

It’s easy to forget that the Fantastic Beasts franchise is even a thing. Next to the monstrous popularity of the Harry Potter books and films and the wider franchise’s increasing controversy thanks to its contentious creator, these films barely register as anything more than a shallow attempt to recapture the magic. The third film The Secrets of Dumbledore leans even further into the Harry Potter mythos we know and love as a cheap nostalgia ploy to attempt to conceal yet another jumbled, poorly planned instalment filled with weak characters, zero emotional investment and more plot holes than J.K. Rowling herself could imagine.

Following his climactic encounter with Grindelwald (formerly Johnny Depp, now Mads Mikkelsen) in the events of The Crimes of Grindelwald Newt Scamander (Eddie Redmayne) finds himself on yet another quest at Albus Dumbledore’s (Jude Law) request to recover a Chillen, a mythical creature with the ability to identify the purest of heart amongst the magical community. With Grindelwald’s follower Credence (Ezra Miller) – newly revealed to be a Dumbledore – hot on their heels, Newt, his brother Theseus (Callum Turner), Professor Hicks (Jessica Williams) and muggle Jacob (Dan Fogler) must embark on a desperate mission to prevent Grindelwald from gaining power over the entire magical world, encountering all sorts of terrifying beasts and dangerous magic along the way.

Warner Bros, 2022

The most unforgivable curse the Fantastic Beasts series casts is its complete lack of planning. Film to film, the connective tissue just isn’t there, with each subsequent movie never feeling as if it is written to continue character arcs or even basic story threads. The Harry Potter films were convoluted, sure, but here it feels as if every scene introduces a complicated new concept or set of rules before throwing them out the window shortly after and dumping needless exposition on us to explain why those rules were broken. It leads to a larger story that feels muddled and totally unsure of what it is even about. Who is the audience supposed to view as their protagonist at this point? Newt seems moved to the side of what was once his franchise, Dumbledore postures a lot but his contributions to the action are minimal and Grindelwald remains the ever present threat, rarely seen but often mentioned.

Claudia Kim’s Nagini, framed to become a much larger piece of the puzzle in Crimes of Grindelwald is completely absent here, as is Katherine Waterston’s Tina Goldstein – a franchise stalwart gone without a trace save for one small, unexplained appearance. Then there’s Gellert Grindelwald, essentially this franchise’s Voldemort, who has undergone a change in actor with each film. The shift from Depp to Mikkelsen was necessary, and Mikkelsen does a fantastic job at finally establishing a character that is charismatic enough to warrant the legions of wizards and witches that pledge themselves to him, whilst harbouring a darker side that makes him a sufficient threat to Dumbledore.

Warner Bros, 2022

Still, Farrell’s original shift was unnecessary and means that each subsequent actor has had to work harder and harder to make Grindelwald the threat these films constantly remind us he is. After 3 films of a planned 5, he is only now coming into his own as the villain he has always been positioned as and whether intentioned or not, that makes for significantly less investment than Potter had garnered through Ralph Fiennes’ Voldemort after the same number of appearances.

Then there’s Credence, a character once considered the linchpin of the series due to his powers as a mysterious Obscurus, who is unceremoniously tossed to the side; his lineage – the prior film’s big cliffhanger – warranting mere minutes of mention before the film promptly moves on to some new confusing plot point. Simply adding new wrinkles to a character’s backstory without addressing the previously established beats is lazy screenwriting, and while it likely means the end of Ezra Miller (good riddance), it yet again makes for a messy, unfocused film.

With the state of the franchise in general covered, we can focus on this latest car crash. Grindelwald, for one, is given an utterly ridiculous arc; shifting from the most wanted fugitive in the world, to an acquitted freeman without even being caught, to a sudden nominee for leader of the entire magical world (a political position that you think would have been important during Voldemort’s reign but was strangely absent) in the blink of an eye. It’s an unsettlingly close Hitler allegory that even relies on the German Minister of Magic to set the pieces in play for Grindelwald’s rise to power. As if that wasn’t enough, the dark wizard’s political platform is entirely based around cleansing the world of muggles, a view that gains far too much traction too quickly amongst the wizarding community. Oh, but it’s ok, because the leader must be chosen by the Chillen, an animal that can detect the pure of heart and has been tasked with deciding the leader of the entire magical world because… well your guess is as good as mine.

Warner Bros, 2022

The only thing that can prevent this rise to power, of course, is Dumbledore, who is unable to act against Grindelwald thanks to the powers of a blood pact the two made decades ago. It’s a spanner in the works for all of five minutes as both Grindelwald and Dumbledore set their minions to do their dirty work for them, despite the film showing us that either will literally perish if they do this. By the end of the film it’s all swept aside, meaning this becomes yet another filler film on the way to the two former lover’s inevitable showdown. Speaking of showdowns, the action is the film’s only bright spot – with several engaging set-pieces sparking brief glimpses of the magic of old, largely thanks to familiar props and musical cues from the Harry Potter films. A cheap but effective form of nostalgic manipulation that manages to be the only thing the film does competently.

The Secrets of Dumbledore is yet another misfire for a franchise that has no idea how to escape the shadow of the much more successful Harry Potter or how to further that lore in a meaningful way, through a story that actually warrants telling. Each scene seems to contradict the one that came before and needless complications cloud an unsure, poorly planned story from ever becoming anything other than a series of events vaguely reminiscent of a world that was once beloved. With two more films confirmed to be on the way, it is going to take a hell of a lot of magic to bring the fantastic back to this franchise.

Warner Bros, 2022

Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore stars Eddie Redmayne, Jude Law, Dan Fogler, Ezra Miller, Jessica Williams, Callum Turner, Alison Sudol, Richard Coyle, William Nadylam, Katherine Waterston & Mads Mikkelsen – In cinemas now.

Rating: 3 out of 10.

3/10

Categories
Movie Reviews

The Trial of the Chicago 7

Dreamworks Pictures/Netflix, 2020

America has been in an interesting state this year. From the devastating impact of the pandemic and its mismanagement by the government to the recent Black Lives Matter protests and rise of white supremacists, it seems as if the country was on the brink of collapse. It seems almost too good to be true then that Netflix’s latest film The Trial of the Chicago 7 released when it did, tapping into the country’s fear of racial discrimination and police brutality in a way that perfectly captures the public’s fury at the horrifying events which have plagued the country. Written and directed by master scribe Aaron Sorkin, the film tells the story of the 1968 Democratic Convention riots in Chicago and the subsequent trial of the seven individuals charged with inciting the riots, with dialogue only he could pen, crackling with intensity and urgency. Beyond the writing, the film also features some incredible performances from the entire cast including Sacha Baron Cohen, Eddie Redmayne and Frank Langella (to name a few) which should make it a sure-fire contender come Oscar season.

For those who don’t know the story of the Democratic convention riots, the film does a good job early on to introduce you to the many elements and characters that led to the ultimate violent clash between protestors and police. At the height of the Vietnam War, three protest groups in America – all seemingly independent yet aware of each other – agreed to demonstrate against forced conscription by rallying in Chicago’s Grant Park. Once the police arrive and things get out of hand, chaos erupts, ultimately leading to the arrest of eight men: Tom Hayden (Eddie Redmayne), Rennie Davis (Alex Sharp), Abbie Hoffman (Sacha Baron Cohen), Jerry Rubin (Jeremy Strong), David Dillinger (John Carroll Lynch), John Froines (Danny Flaherty), Lee Weiner (Noah Robbins) and Bobby Seale (Yahya Abdul-Mateen II), the leader of the Black Panthers. The trial that ensues is anything but ordinary, a farcical mess thanks to the clearly prejudiced presiding Judge Julius Hoffman (Frank Langella), leaving defence attorney William Kunstler (Mark Rylance) little recourse in his fight for justice; essentially handing the win to prosecution lawyer Richard Schultz (Joseph Gordon-Levitt).

Dreamworks Pictures/Netflix, 2020

While it does take some dramatic liberties with certain aspects of the story, Sorkin’s script is a masterclass in engaging, fast-flowing dialogue. The few scenes of action are very well shot, with Sorkin showing an eye for fast, frenetic paced chaos but it is the dialogue that is utterly spellbinding and will have you glued to your seat throughout the entire trial. Rarely do courtroom films feel so alive and full of energy, with each outburst from the judge or one of the defendants adding an extra layer to the trial and further stacking the deck against the Chicago 7. It might not be entirely realistic for the court to be so lively but Sorkin writes with such passion for justice that it is extremely hard not to get invested, as Kunstler desperately attempts to make Judge Hoffman see reason and that Bobby Seale’s rights are being infringed upon. Seale is the only accused not to be represented by Kunstler (hence it not being the Chicago 8) and his back-and-forth with Judge Hoffman is magnificent, filled with rage and mutual contempt. It has been a good long while since I have been as invested in a film’s courtroom case as much as this one, and it is clearly an area that Sorkin thrives in, following A Few Good Men and The Social Network’s equally arresting trials.

A good script is nothing without actors to bring it to life and Sorkin has assembled a veritable smorgasbord of talent here to do it. Eddie Redmayne as Tom Hayden is the perpetually unsure yet resolute champion for civil rights revolution through non-violent, legal means. Redmayne fluctuates between remorse for the riots that he may have had a hand in starting and confidence that – once they bite their tongues and win the trial – they can continue to make strides towards civil rights change. You can feel the internal conflict within Redmayne; moving between nervous looks and hard unblinking gazes that underly the terror he feels at the thought of going to prison. Sacha Baron Cohen’s Abby Hoffman, on the other hand, does not share this same view, perpetually confident that the trial will be the loud, public spectacle that will bring worldwide attention to the civil rights injustice in America and willing to sacrifice himself for that ideal if need be. The not-so-subtle jabs he and the equally great Jeremy Strong shoot at Judge Hoffman are particular highlights; moments of levity and humour that give the audience a respite from the bleak outlook of the trial. As the trial wears on, Abby’s confident façade begins to fade, a weariness settling over him and a fear that the trial will not actually change things. Baron Cohen’s performance is excellent, playing not only to his comedic strengths but also his outspoken political ideals (just look at his Borat sequel); a winning combination that may just net him a well-deserved Best Supporting Actor nod.

Dreamworks Pictures/Netflix, 2020

Frank Langella threatens to outshine them all, however, as the aggressively one-sided Judge Hoffman. The man embodies the worst traits of the upper class; snubbing his nose at the “hippy” Chicago 7 and denying them their due process in the system. It’s a performance that, on its surface, works to make you absolutely loathe the character and get you completely behind the Chicago 7, but Langella goes a step further, giving the Judge perhaps a hint of Dementia or some other illness as he stumbles through speeches at times, contorting his face in odd expressions and ignoring the rigid rules of the court in order to espouse his own opinions. It works to ground the character as a relic of a time gone by and a physical embodiment of the pro-Vietnam sentiment that the protesting defendants are up against. To this man, not enlisting is one of the most heinous crimes that can be committed, regardless of the reasoning, and no force on earth will stop him from convicting these men.

The Trial of the Chicago 7 is an incredibly timely film. One that will have you in a blind rage at the injustices you are seeing, made all the more potent by the contemporary comparisons that can be made. Aaron Sorkin’s writing is as excellent as ever, if a little bombastic at times, but it does the trick to get you so completely behind these eight men that have suffered such injustice. With excellent performances from the entire cast and some spot-on costuming and set design that will have you thinking you’ve been transported to the 60’s, this is an absolute home-run of a film for Netflix; a serious awards contender that deserves the praise that is being heaped on it and the best film of the year so far.

Dreamworks Pictures/Netflix, 2020

The Trial of the Chicago 7 stars Eddie Redmayne, Sacha Baron Cohen, Frank Langella, Mark Rylance, Jeremy Strong, Joseph Gordon Levitt, Yahya Abdul-Mateen II, Alex Sharp, John Carroll Lynch, Ben Shenkman & Michael Keaton – Streaming on Netflix now.