Chiwetel Ejiofor | Screenlife Reviews

We’re now over 30 entries into the MCU and in that time we’ve seen just about everything from epic space-operas to tales of gods and devils. What we’ve rarely seen in the MCU is a film that truly embraces the style of its director (Thor: Ragnarok aside); that contorts the usual trappings of a Marvel movie to fit around an auteur rather than the other way around. Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness fundamentally feels like a Sam Raimi film through and through, and that is a massive win for a franchise that has seemed to grow increasingly similar across instalments. Bringing with him heavier elements of horror and a unique visual eye for the camera, Sam Raimi has crafted one of the most stylistic entries into the Marvel canon, bursting with energy from start to finish.

When America Chavez (Xochitl Gomez), a mysterious young girl with the power to create portals through universes, arrives in New York City with a demonic monster hot on her heels, Stephen Strange (Benedict Cumberbatch) and the now Sorcerer Supreme Wong (Benedict Wong) work quickly to intercept her. Believing that her powers could inadvertently cause irreparable damage to the entire multiverse, Strange turns to an isolating and clearly traumatised Wanda Maximoff (Elizabeth Olsen) for assistance in protecting the girl. As Wanda’s true motives become clear, however, Strange and America are forced to go on the run between universes in a bid to protect the girl and find a way to lock away the evil pursuing them.

What could have been another run-of-the-mill Marvel film is so elevated by Raimi’s style; the usual visual effects heavy madness given new life with inventive camera movements and editing choices that place a lot of emphasis on the horror elements Raimi brings to the table. For die-hard fans of The Evil Dead and Drag Me to Hell wondering whether Raimi would lean more towards his horror roots or his Spider-Man history, fear not, this is as close to a body-horror fright-fest in the MCU as possible. Long, suspense-filled shots end with shocking jump scares, kills are gorier than ever and Danny Elfman’s eerie score – filled with shrieking strings and ominous wailing – add weight to what could have been a far more lighthearted trip through the multiverse. Raimi even goes so far as to add in an element of the slasher genre, with the constantly looming presence of Strange and America’s pursuer never far behind, providing an urgency to their actions that makes for an appropriately panicked, fast-paced affair.

Somewhat expectedly, after months and months of post-No Way Home speculation, there are plenty of fan service multiverse moments here sure to please fans, even if they can’t possibly fulfil every wild wish and fantasy. Reports that these were added in following the release of the latest Spider-Man, whilst unconfirmed, would prove reasonable, as this is also where the film’s pacing slows down significantly, as it attempts to unload chunks of exposition at you to explain its, at times, incredibly confusing central premise whilst throwing new faces at you. These appearances are by no means necessary, and don’t further the overarching MCU plot in any significant ways, but Raimi manages to have a lot of fun with the surprises, going in unexpected and gleefully macabre directions that only the man who gave us the off-kilter masterpiece Evil Dead 2 could pull off.

As is the case with majority of Raimi’s films, there is a healthy heaping of cheesy humour thrown in for good measure; a lot of which doesn’t work in the usual Marvel manner. It isn’t bad by any means, but with everything going on and with the audience constantly being swept from location to location, it falls by the wayside in the bigger picture. Still the final act does feature some of the best prosthetics work in all of Marvel, in a scene that could have been pulled directly from the Evil Dead franchise; showing one of the biggest proponents for campy humour at his campy best.

Being only his second solo outing since the original Doctor Strange in 2016, there is a lot of room here for an exploration of Strange’s character and how the tumultuous events of his Avengers appearances have affected him. Michael Waldron – writer of last year’s Loki – tackles the material on a much more intimate level, crafting a multi-dimensionally sad story for Strange and any potential hope for a life beyond his superhero duties with former flame Christine (Rachel McAdams). It’s an emotionally meaty storyline that Cumberbatch sinks his teeth into, giving less of the arrogant surgeon that we saw in 2016 and portraying the former Sorcerer Supreme as a much richer character who has seen and evolved from all he has experienced.

On a similar journey of self-discovery is Wanda who, following on from the events of WandaVision longs for the children she has lost, with Elizabeth Olsen taking the characters to some truly dark places in her desperation. It’s her best performance as the Scarlet Witch to date, as she continues to make this deeply tragic woman one of the MCU’s most interesting characters.

Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness won’t be to everyone’s taste. It’s a drastic shift in the tone we have come to know, given Marvel’s miraculous willingness to commit to Sam Raimi’s vision and unique style. Cumberbatch and Olsen are the best they have ever been, telling a touching, intimate story on such an enormous scale whilst Raimi ensures we are always entertained, constantly finding inventive filmic techniques and genre trappings to tell an MCU story in a bold new way. Forget Wong’s warnings, you’d be mad not to dive into this multiverse.

Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness stars Benedict Cumberpatch, Elizabeth Olsen, Xochitl Gomez, Benedict Wong, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Rachel McAdams, Bruce Campbell & Michael Stuhlbarg – In cinemas now.

9/10

The original Maleficent was a gamble for Disney back in 2014, being one of the first of what would become a seemingly endless stream of modern updates to animated classics. Based on the familiar tale of Sleeping Beauty, the film shook up the source’s story and characters to create an entirely new tale – one that became a template for several future Disney films in the following years. While the core plot itself was fairly standard, Maleficent found success with its darker tone, stunning visuals and a defining performance by Angelina Jolie as the titular sorceress. It’s been five years since the original, and we now find ourselves presented with its follow up fantasy sequel: Maleficent: Mistress of Evil. Aiming to build upon the foundations of its first chapter, the film certainly manages to go bigger and bolder the second time around. However, while it may be a longer and more brutal adventure than the original, the sequel suffers from a standard plot and pacing issues throughout – saved only by some amazing sights and the efforts of its three immensely talented leads.

Maleficent: Mistress of Evil picks up several years after the events of the first film, with a grown Aurora (Elle Fanning) ruling over the enchanted woods and its creatures as the Moors’ human queen. When she’s asked for her hand in marriage by the neighbouring kingdom’s Prince Philip (a recasted Harris Dickinson), she quickly accepts. This doesn’t sit too well with Aurora’s godmother Maleficent (Angelina Jolie), who despises and distrusts all humans following some rough dealings with them in the past. This hatred is only fuelled upon meeting Philip’s mother, Queen Ingrith (Michelle Pfeiffer), who seems intent on driving a wedge between Aurora and her adoptive mother. What follows these opening minutes is a lengthy adventure that never strays too far from this base concept. Where the film does attempt to move away from expectations or present something new, it often leads to drawn out and unnecessary world building – most of which amounts to very little in the grand scheme of things. It feels as if much of the story and plot devices were pulled together from a range of ideas and narratives, rather than developed as one cohesive tale that flows from beginning to end. The first film also covered almost all of the lore and events of the original Sleeping Beauty, and this has forced the sequel to get creative in places – albeit to mixed results.

Thankfully the original duo of Fanning and Jolie return to reprise their respective roles, and continue to do a fantastic job of carrying the audience through the adventure. Aurora becomes a fish-out-of-water for much of the film, struggling to balance the expectations of her new life, those she is charged with ruling over in her woodland home and the fury of her protective guardian. Fanning conveys these conflicts perfectly, bringing maturity and strength to her former role while also maintaining the charm of a young girl raised in an enchanted forest. Then comes Jolie, who once again appears to have been born to play the dark sorceress Maleficent. Stealing just about all of the film’s biggest scenes, her character commands every major conflict and challenge that the tale throws out. She’s the titular character for a reason, and her one of a kind performance is easily the film’s biggest redeeming feature.

Rising up to challenge Maleficent this time around is Michelle Pfeiffer’s Ingrith, queen of the kingdom bordering the Moors and Aurora’s soon to be mother-in-law. As expected, Pfeiffer brings an incredible amount of experience and pedigree to the powerful queen, creating a villain that does well to rival Jolie throughout the film. However Queen Ingrith is often a bit too heavy handed with the villainy, with some late attempts at explaining her behaviour doing little to justify how evil she eventually becomes. From the moment she steps on screen, she’s been written to be completely loathed by audiences at every turn. To be honest; Maleficent really didn’t need a second chapter, and creating one sees Pfeiffer’s character suffer from having to go from a complete unknown to a remorseless villain in a very short space of time.

Rounding out the cast is the Queen’s son Philip, who plays the typical Disney prince in search of his princess. Despite being re-casted following the first film, the switch to Harris Dickinson doesn’t hurt things too much and he does well to bring some life to his character’s limited scenes. Another returning character is Diaval (Sam Riley), who continues to act as Maleficent’s right hand and confidant. Riley’s screentime is as limited as it was in the first chapter, however he injects the film with a bit of charm and wit while also shedding light on Maleficent’s more guarded emotions. With so many characters already sharing the screen, it’s hard to imagine being able to expand the roster any further – however the film also manages to introduce two new faces in Conall (Chiwetel Ejiofor) and Borra (Ed Skrein). For reasons I won’t spoil, the two share close ties to Maleficent herself and both attempt to make an ally of her for their own means. While the two actors do well in their respective roles, the characters themselves ultimately just exist to extend the plot further than it ever needed to be – again feeling like another product of a needless sequel. There’s also a significant amount of time given to developing these characters and their connection to Maleficent around the halfway point, which is at odds with an eventual conclusion that feels rushed and disjointed by comparison.

Yet while the extended runtime might not always be spot-on from a narrative perspective, it does give audiences more time to take in what is admittedly a beautiful looking film. The effects on display are some of the most vivid and realistic visuals seen in any recent fantasy epic, with lush green forests and grand castles completely capturing the Disney fairytale vibe. The woodland creatures are all intricately detailed and brought to life, and Jolie’s imposing black wings are so well done and perfectly woven into her movements, you’d swear she was born with them. These sights are in addition to the huge amount of costume and design work that has also gone into every piece of the film – many of which outdoing the already amazing work from the original. Maleficent’s horns and gowns are insanely well done, and are offset by Aurora’s floral numbers and Queen Ingrith’s outrageous pearl and jewel encrusted sets. While the excellent visual work doesn’t completely save the plot here, it certainly goes a long way in creating a sight worth seeing on the big screen.

All in all, Maleficent: Mistress of Evil is a fine attempt at a sequel that had no real reason to exist. Its three strong leads and beautiful world create a real spectacle alive with action and colour, however it’s unable to escape the basic plot and needlessly drawn out world building lying beneath it all. Fans of Jolie, Pfeiffer or Fanning and those who enjoyed the original will be the ones who stand to enjoy this the most, as the film doesn’t quite stand tall amongst some of the other strong stories that have been told in cinemas this year. Yet while it may not reach the starry heights that it was aiming for on its second outing, when Maleficent: Mistress of Evil does shine – it shines bright.

Maleficent: Mistress of Evil stars Angelina Jolie, Elle Fanning, Michelle Pfeiffer, Harris Dickinson, Sam Riley, Chiwetel Ejiofor and Ed Skrein – In cinemas now.